Thursday, May 15, 2014

ARGUING vs. DEBATING

Debating is a civilized way of arguing.  If there are substantial differences between the two sides, in my book, that calls for an argument.  That means you don't have to wait your turn to speak---just jump right in before you forget what you wanted to say.

The purpose in debating is to impress the judges so you win the debate.  In arguing, the purpose is to drive your opponent into the ground and if, in the end, he still doesn't agree with your position, kick or punch him.

Debating requires following certain rules, much like a sport,   When arguing, there is no finessing a point.  It is much like a street brawl.  Voices are raised, veins swell in the neck and fists are clenched.  Most arguments end peacefully with neither side having been persuaded by the other but not with the smile and handshake required by debates.  As soon as your opponent in an argument turns his back, you give him the infamous finger salute.

Debates are planned, rehearsed.  The speaker has had time to research, plan and practice every word he will utter.  He has analyzed what the rebuttal could be to his presentation.  In other words, he is loaded for bear.  The "argument", on the other hand, is spontaneous, no preparation and requires "thinking on your feet", like a sword fight.  Finding just the right word or point in an argument is an achievement compared to the consultation and research of the debater.

A brief argument is superior to a five mile run in the park for your heart.   A failed argument leads you to learning new, better words, pejoratives and profanity.  Overall, arguments are good things.

No comments: